As there are many
different types of essay forms such as expository, persuasive,
compare/contrast, critical/evaluative, descriptive, or even cause/effect (Kaplan
University Writing Center, 2010). Therefore, researching these essay forms within,
“The Kaplan Guide to Successful Writing”, before reading the required article
seemed to be the best course of action.
The many different types of essay forms available allow writers the
ability to express researched information or opinions in various methods. After reading and reviewing the required
article, “Organizations' information security
policy compliance: Stick or carrot approach?” by (Yan Chen, Winter 2012
- 13),
I found it to be quite a heavy read.
Although, the article did contain very informative information that I
may use in the future to come.
Throughout reading the article there were many keys towards the essay
form expository and I plan to explain further.
An expository essay form
utilizes facts instead of opinions and its overall purpose is to inform the
audience about the subject matter. Also,
it is not utilized for argumentative usage of any kind and it is a great way to
learn about different perspectives. This
type of essay is used by many students as it is great to explore a large
variety of topics. Audiences for an
expository essay is a very general one as it can depend on the chosen topic. As with most essays it is always best to
assume the audience does not have any prior knowledge within the topic (Kaplan
University Writing Center, 2010).
As we all fully
understand the basics of an expository essay form, relating the essay and form
together can be quite easy if its laid out for you. For example, an expository form utilizes
research during the beginning of the essay and will apply any type of facts
throughout without persuasion. Just as
the beginning paragraphs within the article of, “Organizations' information security policy compliance: Stick or carrot
approach?” (Yan Chen, Winter 2012 - 13), provides an
introduction of the authors, an abstract, then facts from research found within
another article about an information security concern. Therefore, they move
forward with discussing information security policy compliance and its
organization. The author Yan Chen,
utilizes a list of facts and explains the research found for each piece of
information within the information security policy compliance option.
The fact of the matter
is that the entire essay of thirty-three pages contains a numerous amount of
information in many different depictions.
All the way from words/sentences, pictures/figures, tables/spreadsheets,
and even graphs/modes. To further
explain the examples of an expository essay form these would show the
following. Figures and research models
are provided throughout the essay along with hypothesis. As the research progresses for the
information security compliance essay there are test results available for
others to view. Along with many other
tables that compare results between the punishments, rewards, and enforcement. Overall, with the amount of research data
shown it provides enough evidence to be an expository.
In conclusion, I
honestly had a slight feeling that it could be two essay forms but I stuck with
one essay form to play it on the safe side.
The entire article itself is full of
research and information, Organizations' information security policy compliance:
Stick or carrot approach?, and not once does it have any persuasion,
cause/effect, critical/evaultive, but could be considered a bit descriptive
considered the length. Overall, the article
is a great read and will be very beneficial to my future. With the recent problems and issues lately, I
may change my Master’s major and look into Information Security.
References
Jennifer Propp, J. T. (2010). Essay Forms. In The Kaplan
Guide to Successful Writing (pp. 349-388). New York: Kaplan Publishing, a
division of Kaplan, inc.
Yan Chen, K. (.-W. (Winter 2012 - 13). Organizations'
information security policy compliance: Stick or carrot approach? Journal of
Management Information Systems, 29(3), 157 - 188.
doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222290305
No comments:
Post a Comment